Knowledge Ridge

Addressing India’s Infrastructure Barriers

Addressing India’s Infrastructure Barriers

March 3, 2026 5 min read Industrials
#Indian infrastructure engineering, CBAM, construction
Addressing India’s Infrastructure Barriers

Q1. Could you start by giving us a brief overview of your professional background, particularly focusing on your expertise in the industry?

I am a Chartered engineer with 52 years of extensive experience across hydropower, tunnels, cement, fertiliser, coal mining, underground opencast, hotels, reality, roads, and almost all types of infrastructure. I retired as President of Jaiprakash Associates, one of the largest infrastructure companies, and as a director of MPJML.

Currently self-employed, providing need-based consultancy services to infrastructure and manufacturing companies with a focus on safety, quality compliance, energy conservation, environment protection.

Have conducted seminars/workshops on energy conservation, environmental protection, and technological upgradation in equipment manufacturing and execution methodologies.

 

Q2. With the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) active in 2026, how much will 'environment protection' compliance costs squeeze the net margins for Indian fertilizer and cement exporters to the EU?

The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) becomes fully active on January 1, 2026, forcing Indian exporters of high-carbon goods like cement and fertilizers to pay for embedded emissions, significantly squeezing net margins. This policy aims to equalize carbon costs between EU producers and imports, with estimated tax burdens on Indian exports reaching 19.8% to 52.7%, forcing a shift toward greener, cleaner production to remain competitive.
Margin Squeeze: The added compliance costs, including mandatory third-party verification, will likely reduce net margins by 5 to 7.5 percent for Indian exporters, especially as Indian production is heavily reliant on coal, which is far more carbon-intensive than the EU average.

 

Q3. For cement units, what is the realistic payback period for a Waste Heat Recovery System (WHRS) in 2026, and why do many distressed units fail to implement this despite the clear OPEX reduction?

The typical payback period for Waste Heat Recovery Systems (WHRS) in Indian cement plants is approximately 3 to 5 years. These systems, which harness heat from kiln and cooler exhaust gases to generate electricity (25-45 kWh/tonne of clinker), have seen widespread adoption under the Perform, Achieve and Trade (PAT) scheme, often reducing operating costs by up to Rs 150/MT. 

The high upfront investment and technical complexity of integrating WHR systems into existing, often older, plants are the primary reasons why, despite long-term cost benefits, many units refrain from adoption.

 

Q4. For hydropower or mining projects in remote areas, how does a supply chain bottleneck typically impact the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of a project if delayed by just one monsoon season?

A one-monsoon-season delay in remote-area hydropower and mining projects can severely impact the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) by delaying revenue generation, increasing financing costs, and increasing construction expenses. For infrastructure projects, monsoon-related delays can lead to a 5% increase in project duration and a 12% rise in costs.

 

Q5. While setting up greenfield projects, what is the single most common 'invisible' procurement error that results in a cost overrun before the project even reaches completion?

Greenfield projects are highly susceptible to cost overruns caused by single, overlooked, or "invisible" procurement errors, which often manifest as unforeseen expenses before project completion. Inefficient procurement practices—such as relying on the lowest bidder without evaluating reliability, poorly defined contracts, or missing long-lead items—can trigger a cascade of issues, including material shortages, rework, and substantial budget inflation.

 

Q6. If you were an investor looking at companies within the space, what critical question would you pose to their senior management?

Evaluating senior management is a critical part of investment due diligence, focusing on their strategic foresight, operational competence, capital allocation skills, and integrity. Based on investor best practices, here are critical questions for senior management, categorized by key evaluation areas
Strategic Vision and Competitive Advantage

  • What is your long-term strategic vision for the next 5-10 years, and how does this funding round specifically accelerate that?
  • If your company didn't exist tomorrow morning, what would your customers miss the most, and why?
  • What is the single biggest threat to your business (competitor or technology), and how are you pivoting to meet it?
  • How has your competitive advantage evolved over the last 3 years, and what are you doing to widen your "moat"?
  • What part of the business has the most upside potential
     

 


Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Newsletter

Stay on top of the latest Expert Network Industry Tips, Trends and Best Practices through Knowledge Ridge Blog.

Our Core Services

Explore our key offerings designed to help businesses connect with the right experts and achieve impactful outcomes.

Expert Calls

Get first-hand insights via phone consultations from our global expert network.

Read more →

B2B Expert Surveys

Understand customer preferences through custom questionnaires.

Read more →

Expert Term Engagements

Hire experts to guide you on critical projects or assignments.

Read more →

Executive/Board Placements

Let us find the ideal strategic hire for your leadership needs.

Read more →